hintlFocus at workstanding desk

Does Using a Standing Desk Increase Work Concentration? What Two Studies Tell Us

スタンディングデスク · standing desk · Last updated:

hintl editorial team / Work & Focus Desk

Work genre desk — research review

木製天板のスタンディングデスクとモニター、椅子のある部屋
Research data last updated: |How this works

Key points

No clear difference has been shown.

For attention · 2 studies · 64 participants

hintl Evidence Score 44/100 (2 studies, confidence low).

Evidence at a glance

How does standing desk affect attention?

not supported by evidence
44/100 Evidence ScoreConfidence: low2 studies1 RCT
How the 44 is built
Study design base
randomized controlled trial
+30/40
RCT bonus
1 RCT
+5/15
Study count bonus
2 studies
+4/10
Participants bonus
Total 64 participants
+5/20
Consistency bonus
results differ
0/10

Scoring method

No clear difference has been shown.

  • 2 human studies (64 participants total)
  • Studies point in broadly the same direction
  • Still unknown: few longer-duration studies

  • There are reports that no clear association was found between standing desk use and work concentration.
  • The evidence score is 44, and reliability is limited.
  • This information is useful for those considering changing their work environment to a standing style.

A standing desk is a desk that allows you to work while standing.

It is used in various contexts as furniture for setting up a work or study environment.

What effect standing desk use has on our work concentration is a very interesting topic. Research has been reported showing no clear association between standing desk use and work concentration. In other words, changing to a standing style does not necessarily lead directly to improved concentration.

What kind of research has been conducted so far?

One is a cross-sectional study (a method that investigates the state of a group at a single point in time) involving a small group of 15 people. The other is a study of 49 sixth-grade elementary school students at a public school in Portugal. This study involved an intervention using standing desks over a period of 16 weeks. A total of 64 people participated across these two studies.

From a technical standpoint, there are differences in the methods used. One is called a cross-sectional study (a method that examines the state of data at a specific point in time), while the other used an RCT (randomized controlled trial: a reliable research method that randomly divides participants to compare effects). In other words, because the study designs and subjects differ, caution is needed when interpreting the results.

Looking at the research content, not all studies show the same tendency. One small-scale study reported a decline in attention associated with standing desk use. This suggests the possibility that a change in work environment may affect the ability to carry out tasks in an orderly manner (executive function).

On the other hand, a different study showed different results. In a 16-week study of 49 elementary school students, no improvement in academic performance or cognitive ability was found. This means no particular difference was observed compared with conventional seated instruction. In other words, changing the environment does not necessarily translate directly into results.

In this way, some studies suggest "harm" (a negative effect), while others suggest "no_effect" (no effect). Results vary, making it difficult to draw a uniform conclusion.

Based on this data, there is still much that cannot be stated with certainty about the effect of standing desks. The evidence score is 44, and the reliability of the research is considered limited. This is likely because the number of underlying studies is small — only 2 — and the results are not consistent.

The small amount of accumulated data poses a major obstacle to drawing conclusions. In other words, at this point there is insufficient information to make a definitive statement about how standing desks affect concentration.

The limitations of the research should also be mentioned. This result is based on a limited number of studies — just 2 — and everything cannot be judged from this alone. It may not suit everyone, and there are still many factors that remain unknown.

StudyDesignNumber of ParticipantsDurationMain Result
Applied ergonomics (2021, PMID:33221499)Cross-sectional study15Not reportedA possible negative effect was reported
Scientific reports (2022, PMID:36050353)Randomized controlled trial (RCT)49Not reportedNo clear association was found

The total number of research participants was 64. This breaks down into 49 sixth-grade elementary school students at Portuguese public schools, and a separate group of 15.

Because students are included among the participants, this can serve as a reference point for considering whether it applies to your own learning environment.

There are 2 studies on this topic, using research designs including cross-sectional studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Research has been reported finding no clear association between standing desk use and work concentration, and reliability is considered limited.

There are also differing reports, including some noting a decline in attention and executive function, and others finding no change in academic performance.

Does using a standing desk increase work concentration?

Research has been reported finding no clear association between standing desk use and work concentration. This is based on 2 studies.

Does using a standing desk affect academic performance?

A study involving a 16-week intervention found no results showing improved cognitive function or academic performance compared with conventional seated instruction. This shows the effect on academic outcomes.

What reports exist regarding standing desk use?

There is also research reporting a decline in attention and executive function. Study results show multiple patterns.

Regarding the relationship between standing desk use and concentration, there are reports finding no clear association. The evidence score is 44, and the reliability of the research can be described as limited. Because this data is based on only 2 studies, there is still much that remains unknown. Why not start by using a self-check assessment to reflect on your own style?

References

This page's evaluation is based on the following peer-reviewed studies (2). Each link goes directly to the primary source (PubMed / DOI).

  1. Effect of a 16-week multi-level classroom standing desk intervention on cognitive performance and academic achievement in adolescents.randomized controlled trial (RCT) · Scientific reports · 2022
  2. Effect of standing desk use on cognitive performance and physical workload while engaged with high cognitive demand tasks.cross-sectional study · Applied ergonomics · 2021

Things to keep in mind

  • The amount and quality of research is still limited, so the findings are not conclusive.
  • If you have any medical concerns, do not push yourself and check with a qualified professional.

Related items

Evidence Scores are computed mechanically from the published research (PubMed / Semantic Scholar / OpenAlex): study design, participant numbers, and consistency across studies. An LLM is used only to extract study data, never to decide a score.

This is research-based information, not medical advice, and not a diagnosis. Consult a qualified professional about your own situation.

How the Evidence Score is calculated

Share this:

hintl editorial team / Work & Focus Desk

Work genre desk — research review

We continuously check the published research and translate the technical language into plain terms. The policy is to report a trend in the research, never a flat claim that something "works".

This article was produced by an editorial system from published research and is managed by the editor-in-responsibility (Takuya Hirata, representative of AJARA LLC).